Should We Be Storyteller’s or Marketing Engineers?

At the end of last year The Wall Street Journal reported in “Companies Are Desperately Seeking ‘Storytellers” that corporate job postings for designated “storytellers” doubled as they scrambled to cut through AI-generated noise.

At the end of last month, I noticed a new article from the same reporter Kaite Deighton, “Marketers Are Rebranding as ‘Engineers’ to Survive the AI Era.” This juxtaposition struck me, not only because we seem to have moved on quickly, but also because I have engineering and storytelling in my background.

Which are we to be: Storytellers or Marketing Engineers?

Eclectic: My Education Journey

I started out as an Engineering major. I was attracted to process thinking: a systematic, iterative way to solving problems. But there wasn’t much creativity. Then I spent time as a Marketing major. Unfortunately, my first class was accounting where creativity was not encouraged. I ended up finishing my studies in Journalism with a concentration in Advertising – where I learned storytelling.

I also took a lot of liberal arts classes: Short story writing, poetry, photography, video production, drawing, anthropology, film. But I never forgot what I learned in Engineering. One of my strengths has been uncovering processes to strategy and creativity.

Process: It Only Gets You So Far.

In my ad career I followed a strategic and creative process. That got us to good solutions most of the time for our clients. But sometimes we hit it out of the park with creative solutions that exceeded expectations – winning creative awards and delivering exponential sales, market share, brand awareness, etc. It wasn’t until I began my academic career that I figured out what made the difference.

I had time to reflect. I researched what I knew: advertising creativity. What was the difference between the okay campaigns and the exceptional ones that truly resonated with people? Three of our own research studies one on Super Bowl ads, one on YouTube ads, a new one on Instagram static Posts, and a synthesis of other research later I’m convinced the difference is storytelling.

I’ve done research into Super Bowl ads, Onlline Video ads, and Instagram posts to prove the power of story.

Everyone follows a process. Everyone does consumer research to inform decisions. Rare is the Storyteller. What about the Marketing Engineer? As best I can tell, this is a person taking the same processes we’ve been following for decades and outsourcing some of it to AI. I see how that could be valuable. But I think anyone in their current positions and job titles could be adding AI to current processes outsourcing routine tasks to increase time on more important tasks.

Storytellers: A Skill Not A Trendy Job Title

Perhaps this becomes a temporary position that bridges a gap, but eventually I think it goes away as everyone just learns to integrate AI into their processes. We’ve already seen this pattern the job title Prompt Engineer. As Fortune reported last May, “This Six-Figure Role Was Predicted to Be the Next Big Thing–It’s Already Obsolete Thanks to AI” The reporter describes how this once hyped-up career, Prompt Engineer has shifted from a unique job title to a skill needed by everyone to succeed.

A Fortune article about the Prompt Engineer job not becoming what people expected.

I’ve consistently seen in my studies, professional career, research and teaching the value of storytelling. Only humans can truly understand other humans and have lived, physical experiences and felt true emotions to engage and conect via story. In the first WSJ article, “Storytelling” was appearing in listings as a skill for cross-discipline jobs not a single trendy new job title.

Engineers: They’re Not Replacing Storytellers

I recently turned in the files for the Second Edition of my book with Michael Coolsen Brand Storytelling (due out next Spring). One thing we learned about storytelling and AI is that Engineers are not replacing Creatives and Storytellers. Muskan Manchanda explained in Agency Reporter,

“Spend a day inside any agency today and you’ll notice something feels different. The brainstorms are still animated. The whiteboards are still full. But ideas are taking shape faster. Generative AI has quietly woven itself into the everyday rhythm of agency life — not as a dramatic disruption, but as a steady undercurrent changing how work gets done.”

Generative AI doesn’t replace or change the foundations of the creative process, but it can accelerate certain parts of it. This boost in speed can be reinvested back into valuable human “thinking time.” AI doesn’t replace human instinct, taste, or empathy. It can save some time allowing teams to focus less on manual route taks and more on meaning.

Automation: A Threat To Storytelling:

One thing we did discover is a warning about types of automation described in the WSJ Brand Engineer article such as automating media buying. Google’s performance max (P-Max) campaigns removes the human from the process. Instead of creating distinct ads for different media, marketers upload an “Asset Group” of raw elements (up to 15 headlines, 5 descriptions, 20 images, and 5 videos). Google’s AI dynamically mixes, matches, and deploys the pieces across YouTube, Search, Display, Gmail, and Maps.

Don’t be tempted by the lure of automation when it matters like telling your story.

AI optimization like this sounds great at first, but it removes the brand storytelling. Our Five-Act Story framework (and any story) requires a seqential series of events that capture your attention and move you through the ups and downs of the plot. Imagine if your favorite movie or novel randomly mixed scenes, dialogue, events and characters. Would it have the same appeal?

Lesson: Avoid Shinny Object Syndrome:

I think Marketing Engineer may be another sign of what Marketoonist Tom Fishburne calls “Shinny Object Syndrome.” He observed how marketers love chasing the shiny new thing. His illustration features a group of dogs in a conference room that should be looking at a marketing chart on the screen, but instead they switch mid-sentence to looking out the window saying “Look, Squirrel!” Storytelling isn’t a shinny new thing or a squirrel.

As we explain in our book, storytelling is one of the oldest strategies in the world. Aristotle laid out the basic structure for storytelling in Poetics, written over 2,300 years ago. Story dramas held audience attention in Greco-Roman amphitheaters across the antient world. The works of William Shakespeare have been performed in countless cities and countries for more than 400 years – he was a master storyteller.

Much of what we learn about story began in Greco-Roman amphitheaters. Image by Albrecht Fietz from Pixabay

And yes, modern marketers are called to be storytellers too. Seth Godin wisely says,

“Marketing = storytelling, and everything an organization does supports the story. So everyone is in the marketing department, and a company either tells a story that people care about, or their story disappears.”

Storytelling is a millenia old practice that always works and is always needed. Why would we throw that away to become a Marketing Engineer? Let the Engineers be Engineers. Let Marketers be Storytellers.

Here’s my AI disclosure: I didn’t use AI in writing this. I’m not against using AI in the writing process. I’ve written about AI without using AI and I ‘ve experimented writing about AI using AI. It can be a valuable tool. In this article, I choose not to use it.

I’m looking at my bookshelf trying to understand a shift I see.

Books on my book shelf

When I struggle with something changing in the world I often turn to books. I’m an avid reader with diverse interests.

Right now, I’m looking at my bookshelf to try and figure out what I perceive as a significant shift in the discussion around AI. To understand my view, it’s helpful to see where I’ve been.

My view on AI hasn’t always been the same. It has shifted over the years, but I’ve always tried to navigate my way towards the middle ground.

My 3 1/2-year journey with AI.

In December 2022, I first used ChatGPT. AI wrote a scary good blog article on social media marketing (my expertise) in less than a minute — something that would take me hours.

By December 2024, I spent two years writing about AI without using AI in my writing process ending every post with “100% Human Created.”

By Fall 2024, my LinkedIn feed felt full of criticisms of how woefully behind professors were. We weren’t doing enough to prepare students for the future. In 2024 LinkedIn added the “Enhance with AI” button encouraging users to use AI in writing their posts.

I decided that to better understand AI I needed to use it in the research and writing process of my blog posts – a thing I do frequently. Not LinkedIn’s button, but trying Gemini, ChatGPT, and Claude.

How can I help professionals and students navigate AI without firsthand experience discovering where it can be helpful and harmful?

In Spring 2025, I first used AI to help write about AI. I wanted direct experience with reasoning models to see how they “think” and to help me better understand AI agents and how they may impact professional and student jobs.

That began my journey this past year in using AI to assist in the writing process. It’s been an experiment and I’m learning where AI can genuinely be helpful and where it can be harmful for experienced professionals and for students first learning their profession. I began ending every blog post with various forms of “AI assisted in this post by …”

I haven’t used AI to write an entire post or not checked, verified and taken ownership of anything AI has contributed. My background is an advertising copywriter and I write as a professor.

The last thing I want is AI to replace writers and the writing process. Yet, I’m also a realist and know employers will increasingly seek professionals and students who know how to use AI properly to improve their work.

When I don’t know or understand something I force myself to try it and write about that experience. In the process I learn. That’s what I’ve done with AI.

The shift in the wind?

But its felt different in my LinkedIn feed recently. The calls to “use AI or your behind” seem to have been replaced with “use AI and you’re a fraud.”

What feels like almost overnight, LinkedIn removed their “Enhance with AI” button for writers and replaced it with a new “Seems like AI slop” button for readers.

I know there’s an all AI generated content problem. I know it’s wrong to have AI create or help create content without disclosure. But I’m not sure encouraging us to report each other of suspected AI use is the solution. Some writers are intentionally adding typos out of fear.

I’ve spent two years writing about AI without AI assistance and a year writing about AI with various forms of AI assistance. I’ve learned a lot!

And I’m still learning by writing — trying to figure out the jagged edge of AI help versus AI harm. Maybe I’ll find better ways to use it. Maybe I’ll decide to use it less. Perhaps I’ll decide not to use it at all.

I don’t have it all figured out. One thing I do know is the answer is somewhere in the middle — somewhere between “woefully behind” and “AI fraud.” I also know I wouldn’t have learned if I felt afraid to experiment.

 Books on my book shelf

“History never repeats itself, but the Kaleidoscopic combinations of the pictured present often seem to be constructed out of the broken fragments of antique legends.” – Mark Twain & Charles Dudley Warner in The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today.

What I have I learned from my bookshelf?

S.I. Hayakawa reminds us that the language we use matters because Language directs Thought and Action. He also reminds me most things in life are not all bad or all good (two-value orientation). AI can be both beneficial and harmful on a scale of how it’s used (multi-value orientation).

More recent books raise questions. Are we to be AI First or is AI Snake Oil? Ethan Mollick introduced me to AI as Co-intelligence. Is it or are we on a slippery slope to no-intelligence?

Ray Bradbury gets me wondering if we’re sounding the alarm on each other – sending out the Mechanical Hounds.

Neil Postman has me contemplating whether we’re headed for Technopoly – where efficiency and technology progress replaces human judgment and wisdom.

Then I see Ross Gay’s book of essays. I fondly remember an in person reading where he visibly moved ever in the room, Can we come together, even in this unprecidented time of change, to Incite Joy?

Maybe the winds aren’t as strong or shifting as I perceive. My view is skewed by social media algorithms that emphasize extremes for engagement – even on LinkedIn.

Perhaps I need more time with my books and less time in my social media feed? And that thought brings me to the final question that came to mind while looking at my bookshelf. Ageless wisdom from Dr. Suess:

Are we wearing AI stars or removing them?

Human written. Em dashes & other “AI tells” are mine.