Should We Be Storyteller’s or Marketing Engineers?

At the end of last year The Wall Street Journal reported in “Companies Are Desperately Seeking ‘Storytellers” that the percentage of LinkedIn job postings including the term “storytellers” doubled as businesses scrambled to cut through AI-generated noise.

Recently, I noticed a new article from the same reporter, “Marketers Are Rebranding as ‘Engineers’ to Survive the AI Era.” Huh? This juxtaposition struck me, not only because we seem to have moved on quickly, but also because I have engineering and storytelling in my background. Which is the important skill?

Which are we to be: Storytellers or Marketing Engineers?

An Eclectic Education Journey

I started out as an Engineering major. I was attracted to process thinking: the systematic, iterative way of solving problems. But there wasn’t much creativity. I spent time as a Marketing major but my first class was accounting where creativity was not encouraged. I finished with Journalism and a concentration in Advertising.

I also took a lot of liberal arts classes along the way: short story writing, poetry, photography, video production, drawing, anthropology, film. But I never forgot what I learned in Engineering. One of my strengths has been uncovering and explaining processes for strategy and creativity.

Process Only Gets You So Far

In my advertising career we followed a strategic and creative process. That got us to good solutions most of the time for our clients. But sometimes we hit it out of the park with creative solutions that exceeded expectations – winning creative awards and delivering exponential marketing performance results. It wasn’t until I began my academic career that I figured out what made the difference.

With time to reflect, I researched what I knew: advertising creativity. What is the difference between okay campaigns and exceptional ones? Three of our own research studies (one on Super Bowl ads, one on YouTube ads, a new one on Instagram static Posts) and a synthesis of other research later I’m convinced the difference is storytelling.

I’ve done research into Super Bowl ads, Onlline Video ads, and Instagram posts to prove the power of story.

You Don’t Need Engineers To Improve Process.

What about the Marketing Engineer? As best I can tell, this is a person taking the same processes and outsourcing some of it to AI. I see how that could be valuable.

But anyone in current positions and job titles can add AI to processes and outsource routine tasks to increase time on more important ones.

Everyone follows a process. Everyone does consumer research to inform decisions. AI can speed some of that up. Rare is the Storyteller.

Storytelling Is An Enduring Skill That Transcends Trendy Titles

Perhaps this becomes a temporary position that bridges a gap, but eventually I think it goes away as everyone just learns to integrate AI into their processes. We’ve already seen this pattern in the job title Prompt Engineer. As Fortune reported last May, “This Six-Figure Role Was Predicted to Be the Next Big Thing–It’s Already Obsolete Thanks to AI” The reporter describes how this once hyped-up career, Prompt Engineer has shifted from a unique job title to a skill needed by everyone to succeed.

A Fortune article about the Prompt Engineer job not becoming what people expected.

I’ve seen in my studies, professional career, research and teaching the value of storytelling. AI doesn’t have lived, physical experiences and can’t feel emotions to truly understand another human’s life. That’s needed in many careers. In the first WSJ article, “Storytelling” rose in listings as a skill in different jobs not a single trendy new job title.

In a College of Management, I see how storytelling is relevant to all our students preparing for careers in sales, human resources, management, analytics, entrepreneurship, finance, and yes, accounting. I’ve also taught marketing and storytelling to engineering students.

Engineers Will Not Replace Marketing And Communications Storytellers

I recently turned in the files for the Second Edition of my book with Michael Coolsen Brand Storytelling (due out next Spring). One thing we learned about storytelling and AI is that Engineers are not replacing Creatives, Strategists and Storytellers. As explained in Agency Reporter,

“Spend a day inside any agency today and you’ll notice something feels different. The brainstorms are still animated. The whiteboards are still full. But ideas are taking shape faster. Generative AI has quietly woven itself into the everyday rhythm of agency life — not as a dramatic disruption, but as a steady undercurrent changing how work gets done.”

Generative AI doesn’t replace or change the foundations of the strategic and creative process. It doesn’t replace the need for storytelling. But AI can accelerate certain parts of the process.

This boost in speed can be reinvested in valuable human thinking time. AI doesn’t replace human instinct, taste, or empathy needed for insights, ideas, and story. This applies to marketing, advertising, public relations, and other communications professionals.

AI Automation Is A Threat To Storytelling

One thing we did discover in writing the second edition is a warning about types of automation that impact story. This includes an example described in the WSJ Brand Engineer article – automating media buying.

Google’s performance max (P-Max) campaigns removes the human from the process. Instead of creating distinct ads for different media, marketers upload an “Asset Group” of raw elements (up to 15 headlines, 5 descriptions, 20 images, and 5 videos). Google’s AI dynamically mixes, matches, and deploys the pieces across YouTube, Search, Display, Gmail, and Maps.

Don’t be tempted by the lure of AI automation when it matters like telling your story.

AI optimization like this sounds great at first, but it removes the brand storytelling. Our Five-Act Story framework (and any story) requires a seqential series of events that capture your attention and move you through the ups and downs of the plot. This is what creates and releases tension. It’s what makes you feel sympathy and empathy for the characters.

Imagine if your favorite movie or novel randomly mixed scenes, dialogue, events and characters. Would it have the same appeal?

The Lesson Is Avoid Shinny Object Syndrome

I think Marketing Engineer may be another sign of what Marketoonist Tom Fishburne calls “Shinny Object Syndrome.” He observed how marketers love chasing the shiny new thing.

His illustration shows a group of dogs in a conference room that should be looking at a marketing chart on the screen, but instead they switch mid-sentence to looking out the window saying “Look, Squirrel!” Storytelling isn’t a shinny new thing or a squirrel.

As we explain in our book, storytelling is one of the oldest strategies in the world. Aristotle laid out the basic structure for story in Poetics, written over 2,300 years ago. Story dramas held audience attention in Greco-Roman amphitheaters across the antient world.

What we know about story began in Greco-Roman amphitheaters. Image by Albrecht Fietz from Pixabay

Shakespeare’s works have been performed in countless cities and countries for more than 400 years – he was a master storyteller.

Modern marketers are called to be storytellers too! Seth Godin wisely says,

“Marketing = storytelling, and everything an organization does supports the story. So everyone is in the marketing department, and a company either tells a story that people care about, or their story disappears.”

Storytelling is a millennia-old practice that always works, is always needed and AI can’t authentically tell. Why would we throw that away to become a Marketing Engineer? Let the Engineers be Engineers. Let Marketers be Storytellers.

Here’s my AI disclosure: I didn’t use AI in writing this. I’m not against using AI in the writing process. I’ve written about AI without using AI and I ‘ve experimented writing about AI using AI. It can be a valuable tool. In this article, I choose not to use it.

The Big Story About The Big Game for Super Bowl Ads is Brand Storytelling.

(Updated January 31, 2025)

For advertisers paying $8 million for a 30-second TV ad in the NFL Championship game, the big story isn’t the Philadelphia Eagles versus Kanas City Chiefs, Jalen Hurts versus Patrick Mahomes, or even the odds on a Travis Kelce-Taylor Swift Super Bowl proposal.

Advertisers need to please a lot of eyeballs.

For them, Super Bowl LIX is about the 2025 Super Bowl of advertising and which brand ads will garner the most votes in the Super Bowl ad polls (winners get lots of press) and the most views on social media before, during, and after Sunday’s game. There’s a lot of pressure on marketing managers, ad agencies, and the creative team.

Neilson reports 123 million people in the U.S. watched last year’s Super Bowl LVII with 120 million in the U.S. – roughly 34% of the country. The most popular TV shows like Yellowstone only reach 11.5 million. How do you write a hit Super Bowl Ad for TV and social media?

How are this year’s brand advertisers trying to please?

Adweek reports that 2025’s Super Bowl ad trends include nostalgia, celebrities, animals, Americana imagery, bro culture, and crowd-sourced commercials. Reports say there will be more ads for AI, not ads created by AI.

As an ad copywriter, I felt pressure with regular TV ads. I never had a national Super Bowl ad, but I did create one that ran locally during the Super Bowl. I also worked on Spot Bowl for years – our ad agency’s national Super Bowl ad ratings poll. I gave each ad a title and description as they ran so we could get them up on the website for voting.

Our research of Super Bowl ads found the best way to please is story.

So, what makes one ad more likable to finish in the top ten of USA Today Ad Meter and Spot Bowl versus the bottom ten? When I became a professor my colleague Michael Coolsen and I asked that very question. Was it humor or emotion? Sex appeal or cute animals? This year will it be nostalgia or using TikTok influencers?

Our two-year analysis of 108 Super Bowl commercials published in the Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice found the key to popularity was telling a story. It didn’t matter if you had animals or celebrities and used humor or sex appeal, the underlying factor to likability was a plot. Super Bowl Ad Poll ratings were higher for ads that follow a full five-act story arc and the more acts commercials had the higher the ratings.

The key is a five-act dramatic story structure.

Why five-acts? Remember studying five-act Shakespearian Plays in high school? There was a reason Shakespeare was so popular and why he used to tell a story in five-acts. It is a powerful formula that has drawn people’s attention for hundreds of years.

The classical drama framework we used was conceived by Aristotle, followed by Shakespeare and depicted by German novelist and playwright Gustav Freytag as a pyramid. His theory of drama advanced Aristotle’s to include a more precise five-act structure as seen below.

Five-act stories also draw views and shares in social media.

Ad rating polls of TV ads are one thing, but how does a story perform in social media? We wanted to find out, so we conducted another research study published in the Journal of Interactive Marketing. We analyzed 155 viral advertising YouTube videos from randomly selected brands in different industries over a year.

Videos that told a more developed or complete story had significantly higher shares and views. We coded the videos based on the same five-act dramatic structure in Freytag’s Pyramid: introduction, rising action, climax, falling action, and resolve.

Analyze this year’s Super Bowl ads for story with this template.

Try doing a little storytelling analysis for yourself! Use the downloadable template below. It describes what needs to happen in each act on the left. Then on the right fill out your description of what happened as you watch the Super Bowl ads.

Some will have all five-acts. Some will have only three, two, one, or even zero. In our viral ad study, only 25% of our sample were five-act stories. In fact, there were more zero-act ads at 31%. After coding for the number of acts compare your results to see how they fare in the two ad polls (Ad Meter, Spot Bowl) and in YouTube views.

Budweiser’s Clydesdales are back this year. How will they do?

Budweiser is bringing back its storied Clydesdale ads for a second year after they abandoned them in 2015. The Clydesdale ads were storied because they told full five-act stories and finished in the top 5 of USA Today’s Ad Meter 8 times in 10 years.

In 2014, I successfully predicted that Bud’s Clydesdale ad “Puppy Love” would be the winner because it was a full full-five-act story and it did finish first in ad polls.

In 2016, I successfully predicted their first non-Clydesdale ad “Don’t Back Down” would not finish in the top 10 because it did not tell a complete story – it finished 28th. I recently found this article from iSpot.tv and how their data confirms our academic research findings.

If you’re interested in applying story to all forms of marketing communications our book Brand Storytelling explains how to follow this 5-act dramatic form for TV, online video, and all IMC touchpoints such as print ads, banner ads, direct, radio, and PR.

This Was Human Created Content!